Showing posts with label Functional magnetic resonance imaging. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Functional magnetic resonance imaging. Show all posts

Monday, 2 June 2014

Mind Reading Brain Scanner Technology

So our minds CAN be read: Magnetic scanner produces these actual images from inside people’s brains



  • Process reproduces visual images from analysis of blood flow to brain

  • Experts believe it could be used in future to analyse dreams and memories


By Chris Parsons and Rob Waugh


article 2040599 0E0A118B00000578 910 306x306 300x300 Mind Reading Brain Scanner Technology Scientists have created a revolutionary brain imaging process which allows them to ‘see’ moving images inside people’s minds. As the test subjects think of a video, the researchers ‘see’ it on screen.


It’s the most astonishing demonstration of ‘mind reading’ technology ever demonstrated.


The academics from the University of California, Berkeley, managed to decipher brain activity by measuring blood flow through the brain’s visual cortex, and used this information to construct images of what they were ‘thinking’.



They then converted this information into visual patterns after feeding it through a computer, in a process which scientists say ‘opens a window into the movie of our minds’.


As yet, the technology can only recognise and reconstruct movie clips shown to the test subjects before they braved the scanner.

Read more: http://ift.tt/1dPk2Rn









Tuesday, 6 May 2014

“Neurocinema” uses Brainwaves to Improve Movies

Beats Future 2 thumb 300x187 Neurocinema uses Brainwaves to Improve Movies One thing you aren’t likely to hear Sunday night from the Oscar-winning producer after accepting the trophy for Best Picture: “I’d like to thank my neuroscience partners who helped us enhance the film’s script, characters, and scenes.”


It’s not that far-fetched, though.


A sizable number of neuromarketing companies already brain test movie trailers for the major studios through fMRI, EEG, galvanic skin response, eye-tracking and other biometric approaches. For now, the test data helps the studios and distributors better market the movie.


But what about using brain feedback to help make the movie?


A trailblazing few firms and studios have delved into the upstart practice of “neurocinema,” the method of using neurofeedback to help moviemakers vet and refine film elements such as scripts, characters, plots, scenes, and effects. Princeton University psychology professor Uri Hasson coined the term “neurocinematics” based on an fMRI study, in which he concluded that certain types of films (e.g. horror, action, sci-fi) produced high activation scores in the amygdala region of viewer subjects’ brains, the part that controls disgust, anger, lust, and fear. Hasson asserted that horror filmmakers can potentially control viewers’ brains by precisely editing their films to maximize amygdalic excitement and thus “control for” buzz and success at the theater.


Stephen Susco, who wrote the $187 million grossing horror movie Grudge, is not a practitioner of neurocinema. But he tells Fast Company that he sees its growth as part of the “natural evolution of studios trying to maximize profit while making the upstream development process more scientific, less based on just experience and instinct.”


Other filmmakers seem divided.



Read More








Saturday, 3 May 2014

Turning Thoughts into Words

A new approach allows more information to be extracted from the brain.









By Duncan Graham-Rowe

Thursday, September 23, 2010



Brain-computer interfaces could someday provide a lifeline to “locked-in” patients, who are unable to talk or move but are aware and awake. Many of these patients can communicate by blinking their eyes, but turning blinks into words is time-consuming and exhausting.











ecog x220 Turning Thoughts into Words
Brian interface: The micro electrodes shown here were used to record brain signals in order to decode ten words from a patient’s thoughts.

Credit: Spencer Kellis, University of Utah

Scientists in Utah have now demonstrated a way to determine which of 10 distinct words a person is thinking by recording the electrical activity from the surface of the brain.


The new technique involves training algorithms to recognize specific brain signals picked up by an array of nonpenetrating electrodes placed over the language centers of the brain, says Spencer Kellis, one of the bioengineers who carried out the work at the University of Utah, in Salt Lake City. The approach used is known as electrocorticography (ECoG). The group was able to identify the words “yes,” “no,” “hot, “cold,” “thirsty,” “hungry,” “hello,” “goodbye,” “more,” and “less” with an accuracy of 48 percent.


“The accuracy definitely needs to be improved,” says Kellis. “But we have shown the information is there.”


Individual words have been decoded from brain signals in the past using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), says Eric Leuthardt, director of the Center for Innovation in Neuroscience and Technology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri. This is the first time that the feat has been performed using ECoG, a far more practical and portable approach than fMRI, he says.


Working with colleagues Bradley Greger and Paul House, Kellis placed 16 electrodes on the surface of the brain of a patient being treated art.hold Turning Thoughts into Words for epilepsy. The electrodes recorded signals from the facial motor cortex–an area of the brain that controls face muscles during speech–and over the Wernicke’s area, part of the cerebral cortex that is linked with language. To train the algorithm, signals were analyzed as the patient was asked to repeatedly utter the 10 words.


ECoG has long been used to locate the source of epileptic seizures in the brain. But electrodes used are typically several hundred microns in size and are positioned centimeters apart, says Kellis. “The brain is doing processing at a much finer spatial scale than is really detectable by these standard clinical electrodes,” he says. The Utah team used a new type of microelectrode array developed by PMT Neurosurgical. The electrodes are much smaller–40 microns in size–and are separated by a couple of millimeters.


It’s possible to use less invasive techniques, such as electroencephalography (EEG), which places electrodes on the scalp, to enable brain-to-computer communications. Adrian Owen, a senior scientist in the Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit at the University of Cambridge, UK, has shown that EEG signals can be used to allow people in a persistent vegetative state to communicate “yes” and “no.”


Read More