Showing posts with label Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh. Show all posts

Wednesday, 17 September 2014

Who is Osho?

Osho , born Chandra Mohan Jain (Hindi: चन्द्र मोहन जैन) (11 December 1931 – 19 January 1990), also known as Acharya Rajneesh from the 1960s onwards, calling himself Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh during the 1970s and 1980s and taking the name Osho in 1989, was an Indian mystic and spiritual teacher who garnered an international following. His syncretic teachings emphasise the importance of meditation, awareness, love, celebration, creativity and humour – qualities that he viewed as being suppressed by adherence to static belief systems, religious tradition and socialisation. His teachings have had a notable impact on Western New Age thought,[3] [4] and their popularity has increased markedly since his death.[5] [6]


Osho was a professor of philosophy and travelled throughout India in the 1960s as a public speaker. His views against socialism, Mahatma Gandhi, and institutionalised religion were controversial. He also advocated a more open attitude towards sexuality, a stance that earned him the sobriquet “sex guru” in the Indian and later the international press.[7] In 1970 he settled for a while in Mumbai. He began initiating disciples (known as neo-sannyasins) and took on the role of a spiritual teacher. In his discourses, he reinterpreted writings of religious traditions, mystics and philosophers from around the world. Moving to Pune in 1974, he established an ashram that attracted increasing numbers of Westerners. The ashram offered therapies derived from the Human Potential Movement to its Western audience and made news in India and abroad, chiefly because of its permissive climate and Osho‘s provocative lectures. By the end of the 1970s, there were mounting tensions with the Indian government and the surrounding society.


In 1981, Osho relocated to the United States and his followers established an intentional community, later known as Rajneeshpuram, in the state of Oregon. Within a year the leadership of the commune became embroiled in a conflict with local residents, primarily over land use, which was marked by hostility on both sides. Osho‘s large collection of Rolls-Royce automobiles was also notorious. The Oregon commune collapsed in 1985 when Osho revealed that the commune leadership had committed a number of serious crimes, including a bioterror attack (food contamination) on the citizens of The Dalles. Osho was arrested shortly afterwards and charged with immigration violations. He was deported from the United States in accordance with a plea bargain.[8] [9] [10] Twenty-one countries denied him entry, causing Osho to travel the world before returning to Pune, where he died in 1990. His ashram is today known as the Osho International Meditation Resort.


Teachings


Osho‘s teachings were delivered through his discourses. These were not presented in an academic setting, but were interspersed with jokes, and delivered with an oratory that many found spellbinding.[153] [154] The emphasis of his teaching was not static but changed over time: Osho revelled in paradox and contradiction, making his work difficult to summarise.[155]


Osho spoke on all the major spiritual traditions, including Jainism, Hinduism, Hassidism, Tantrism, Taoism, Christianity, Buddhism, the teachings of a variety of Eastern and Western mystics, and on sacred scriptures such as the Upanishads and the Guru Granth Sahib.[156] His thought was rooted in Hindu advaita, which considers all reality as being of a single divine essence.[157] In this worldview, the human experiences of separateness, duality and temporality are held to be a kind of dance or play of cosmic consciousness; everything within this playful existence is sacred, has absolute worth, and is an end in itself.[157] Besides Eastern religious traditions, Osho also drew on a wide and eclectic range of Western influences in his teaching.[156]


The influence of Heraclitus is traceable in Osho‘s view of the unity of opposites. The influence of Freud and Gurdjieff is traceable in Osho‘s view of man as a machine, condemned to the helpless acting out of unconscious, neurotic patterns.[155] [158] His vision of the “new man” who transcends the constraints of convention is reminiscent of Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil.[159] His views on sexual liberation bear comparison to the thought of D. H. Lawrence.[160] And while his contemporary Jiddu Krishnamurti did not approve of Osho, there are clear similarities between their respective teachings.[155]


Ego and the mind


Osho taught that every human being is a potential Buddha, with the capacity for enlightenment.[161] [162] According to him, everyone is capable of experiencing unconditional love and of responding rather than reacting to life, but he suggested that a person’s ego usually prevents them from enjoying this experience.[161] The ego, in Osho‘s teaching, represents the social conditioning and constraints a person has accumulated since birth, creating false needs that are in conflict with the real self.[163] The problem, he said, is how to bypass the ego so that man’s innate being can flower; how to move from the periphery to the centre.[161] [163]


Osho views the mind first and foremost as a mechanism for survival, replicating behavioural strategies that have proved successful in the past.[161] [163] But the mind’s appeal to the past, he says, deprives human beings of the ability to live authentically in the present.[161] [163] He argued that individuals are continually repressing their genuine emotions, shutting themselves off from joyful experiences that arise naturally when embracing the present moment: “The mind has no inherent capacity for joy. … It only thinks about joy.”[163] [164] The result, he said, is that people poison themselves with all manner of neuroses, jealousies and insecurities.[165] In the case of sexual feelings, for example, Osho believed that repression only makes these feelings re-emerge in another guise, and that the end result was a society obsessed with sex.[165] Instead of suppressing, he argued, people should trust and accept themselves unconditionally.[163] [164] This solution could not be intellectually understood, as the mind would only assimilate it as one more piece of information: instead, what was needed was meditation.[165]


Osho’s “Ten Commandments”


In his early days as Acharya Rajneesh, a correspondent once asked Osho for his “Ten Commandments”. In his letter of reply, Osho noted that it was a difficult matter, because he was against any kind of commandment, but “just for fun” agreed to set out the following:










“

  1. Never obey anyone’s command unless it is coming from within you also.

  2. There is no God other than life itself.

  3. Truth is within you, do not search for it elsewhere.

  4. Love is prayer.

  5. To become a nothingness is the door to truth. Nothingness itself is the means, the goal and attainment.

  6. Life is now and here.

  7. Live wakefully.

  8. Do not swim – float.

  9. Die each moment so that you can be new each moment.

  10. Do not search. That which is, is. Stop and see.


”

He underlined numbers 3, 7, 9 and 10.[182] The ideas expressed in these Commandments have remained a constant leitmotif in his movement.[182]


Source






The post Who is Osho? appeared first on Robert JR Graham.


Wednesday, 27 August 2014

Similarities Between “Control Memes”

Cults, Terrorism, and Religious Fundamentalism


Perhaps the most significant difference between a cult and a religion is the fact that in the latter the veneration is directed towards God, whereas in a cult the love and devotion is directed towards itself. The leader is either God-manifest or God himself. There is no room for question or doubt. Allied with this notion is the belief in the leader’s infallibility. This belief has far-reaching implications.


Total and unquestioning commitment to a guru or a master carries the risk that in the event the leader becomes paranoid or deranged, the followers will have no choice but to remain loyal to the whims of his madness. The tragedies of Jonestown, Waco and Heaven’s Gate involved leaders who, at one time, had credibility. Jim Jones, for example, commenced his work as an ordained member of a Christian Church and was highly regarded by various U.S. dignitaries. During the 1976 American presidential campaign, Jones met with Vice Presidential candidate Walter Mondale on his campaign plane. First Lady Rosalynn Carter personally met Jones for a private dinner at the Stanford Court Hotel in San Francisco.


The notion of infallibility leads many cult members to believe that life without the cult leader is unthinkable. In the event of the leader’s death, the cult members may choose one of two options: to believe that the leader has not really died, as was the case with Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, guru of the Rajneesh organization whose death was viewed as the shedding of a physical cloak, or tragically to follow their leader by committing suicide.


According to terrorism expert, Anthony Stahelski, a professor at Central Washington University, in exchange for providing joiners with meaningful existences and for fulfilling their affiliative emotional needs, the terrorist leader also requests and receives unquestioning obedience from the joiners. Long-term members of the group support the leader’s obedience pressure by applying conformity pressure on new joiners in order to forestall any deviation from the group’s mission or values. The joiners’ initial susceptibility to this intense obedience and conformity pressure makes them extremely vulnerable to the social psychological conditioning process used in violent cults.


There are other differences between cults and religions. Unlike cults, religious groups support the family structure and can be credited with attempting to emphasize its importance in the face of the collapse of the nuclear family. They encourage family contact as well as the use of counseling service to heal relationships. Religious leaders do not assume the role of parents.


Religious orders will not disguise information about the true nature of the organization, its beliefs, and its structure. There are opportunities to question and to inquire. In the mainstream churches, the mission statements, the methods of appointments and the financial records are available to the public. Cults, on the other hand, often make a deliberate effort to conceal the true nature of the group by operating under a variety of names or withholding information from the potential recruit.


The restriction on inquiry or criticism of the organization is a very disturbing feature of many cults. In his book When God Becomes a Drug, Leo Booth suggests that the discouragement of independent thinking is the primary identifying mark of a dysfunctional system. If you cannot question or examine what you are taught, if you cannot doubt or challenge authority, you are in danger of being victimized or abused.


Religions do not divide the world between the good—those who follow the religion—and the bad—those who do not follow it. This division of the world into good and evil is one of the features of cults that are almost universal. Whether the message is presented overtly or subtly, the followers are led to believe that their way is the only way; any departure from the cult and its beliefs will compromise the individual’s quality of life and may be fraught with danger.


The tendency to divide the world into good and evil is also a characteristic of the “fringe churches” that are becoming increasingly popular today. These churches, which present as bona fide Christian organizations, are often guilty of the misrepresentation and deceit practiced by some of the better-known cults.


The complaint against these cult is not the fact that they are secretive, but that they are deceitful, concealing their true aims and their potential effects from followers and families.


In contrast, fraternities such as the Masons, though secretive, openly inform members that they will be taught the more secret rituals of the group as they progress. On this issue Margaret Singer said very succinctly, ”A secret handshake is not equivalent to mind control.”


Source






The post Similarities Between “Control Memes” appeared first on Robert JR Graham.


Saturday, 16 August 2014

Who is Osho?

Osho , born Chandra Mohan Jain (Hindi: चन्द्र मोहन जैन) (11 December 1931 – 19 January 1990), also known as Acharya Rajneesh from the 1960s onwards, calling himself Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh during the 1970s and 1980s and taking the name Osho in 1989, was an Indian mystic and spiritual teacher who garnered an international following. His syncretic teachings emphasise the importance of meditation, awareness, love, celebration, creativity and humour – qualities that he viewed as being suppressed by adherence to static belief systems, religious tradition and socialisation. His teachings have had a notable impact on Western New Age thought,[3] [4] and their popularity has increased markedly since his death.[5] [6]


Osho was a professor of philosophy and travelled throughout India in the 1960s as a public speaker. His views against socialism, Mahatma Gandhi, and institutionalised religion were controversial. He also advocated a more open attitude towards sexuality, a stance that earned him the sobriquet “sex guru” in the Indian and later the international press.[7] In 1970 he settled for a while in Mumbai. He began initiating disciples (known as neo-sannyasins) and took on the role of a spiritual teacher. In his discourses, he reinterpreted writings of religious traditions, mystics and philosophers from around the world. Moving to Pune in 1974, he established an ashram that attracted increasing numbers of Westerners. The ashram offered therapies derived from the Human Potential Movement to its Western audience and made news in India and abroad, chiefly because of its permissive climate and Osho‘s provocative lectures. By the end of the 1970s, there were mounting tensions with the Indian government and the surrounding society.


In 1981, Osho relocated to the United States and his followers established an intentional community, later known as Rajneeshpuram, in the state of Oregon. Within a year the leadership of the commune became embroiled in a conflict with local residents, primarily over land use, which was marked by hostility on both sides. Osho‘s large collection of Rolls-Royce automobiles was also notorious. The Oregon commune collapsed in 1985 when Osho revealed that the commune leadership had committed a number of serious crimes, including a bioterror attack (food contamination) on the citizens of The Dalles. Osho was arrested shortly afterwards and charged with immigration violations. He was deported from the United States in accordance with a plea bargain.[8] [9] [10] Twenty-one countries denied him entry, causing Osho to travel the world before returning to Pune, where he died in 1990. His ashram is today known as the Osho International Meditation Resort.


Teachings


Osho‘s teachings were delivered through his discourses. These were not presented in an academic setting, but were interspersed with jokes, and delivered with an oratory that many found spellbinding.[153] [154] The emphasis of his teaching was not static but changed over time: Osho revelled in paradox and contradiction, making his work difficult to summarise.[155]


Osho spoke on all the major spiritual traditions, including Jainism, Hinduism, Hassidism, Tantrism, Taoism, Christianity, Buddhism, the teachings of a variety of Eastern and Western mystics, and on sacred scriptures such as the Upanishads and the Guru Granth Sahib.[156] His thought was rooted in Hindu advaita, which considers all reality as being of a single divine essence.[157] In this worldview, the human experiences of separateness, duality and temporality are held to be a kind of dance or play of cosmic consciousness; everything within this playful existence is sacred, has absolute worth, and is an end in itself.[157] Besides Eastern religious traditions, Osho also drew on a wide and eclectic range of Western influences in his teaching.[156]


The influence of Heraclitus is traceable in Osho‘s view of the unity of opposites. The influence of Freud and Gurdjieff is traceable in Osho‘s view of man as a machine, condemned to the helpless acting out of unconscious, neurotic patterns.[155] [158] His vision of the “new man” who transcends the constraints of convention is reminiscent of Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil.[159] His views on sexual liberation bear comparison to the thought of D. H. Lawrence.[160] And while his contemporary Jiddu Krishnamurti did not approve of Osho, there are clear similarities between their respective teachings.[155]


Ego and the mind


Osho taught that every human being is a potential Buddha, with the capacity for enlightenment.[161] [162] According to him, everyone is capable of experiencing unconditional love and of responding rather than reacting to life, but he suggested that a person’s ego usually prevents them from enjoying this experience.[161] The ego, in Osho‘s teaching, represents the social conditioning and constraints a person has accumulated since birth, creating false needs that are in conflict with the real self.[163] The problem, he said, is how to bypass the ego so that man’s innate being can flower; how to move from the periphery to the centre.[161] [163]


Osho views the mind first and foremost as a mechanism for survival, replicating behavioural strategies that have proved successful in the past.[161] [163] But the mind’s appeal to the past, he says, deprives human beings of the ability to live authentically in the present.[161] [163] He argued that individuals are continually repressing their genuine emotions, shutting themselves off from joyful experiences that arise naturally when embracing the present moment: “The mind has no inherent capacity for joy. … It only thinks about joy.”[163] [164] The result, he said, is that people poison themselves with all manner of neuroses, jealousies and insecurities.[165] In the case of sexual feelings, for example, Osho believed that repression only makes these feelings re-emerge in another guise, and that the end result was a society obsessed with sex.[165] Instead of suppressing, he argued, people should trust and accept themselves unconditionally.[163] [164] This solution could not be intellectually understood, as the mind would only assimilate it as one more piece of information: instead, what was needed was meditation.[165]


Osho’s “Ten Commandments”


In his early days as Acharya Rajneesh, a correspondent once asked Osho for his “Ten Commandments”. In his letter of reply, Osho noted that it was a difficult matter, because he was against any kind of commandment, but “just for fun” agreed to set out the following:










“

  1. Never obey anyone’s command unless it is coming from within you also.

  2. There is no God other than life itself.

  3. Truth is within you, do not search for it elsewhere.

  4. Love is prayer.

  5. To become a nothingness is the door to truth. Nothingness itself is the means, the goal and attainment.

  6. Life is now and here.

  7. Live wakefully.

  8. Do not swim – float.

  9. Die each moment so that you can be new each moment.

  10. Do not search. That which is, is. Stop and see.


”

He underlined numbers 3, 7, 9 and 10.[182] The ideas expressed in these Commandments have remained a constant leitmotif in his movement.[182]


Source






The post Who is Osho? appeared first on Robert JR Graham.